DVSA Prosecutions
Representation for operators and drivers facing DVSA investigations or prosecutions.
We are expert disqualification solicitors, here to help you avoid driving bans with exceptional hardship arguments, challenges to totting-up proceedings, and applications for early licence return.
Our motoring team defends drivers at risk of losing their licence for issues such as totting up points, drink driving, dangerous driving, and failing to provide a specimen. We explain your options clearly, challenge the evidence where appropriate, put forward exceptional hardship arguments, and advise on applying to get your licence back early.
Defending drivers facing mandatory disqualification after accumulating 12 or more penalty points within three years.
Presenting compelling exceptional hardship arguments persuading courts to avoid or reduce totting up disqualifications.
Defending drink driving prosecutions and presenting mitigation seeking shortest possible mandatory disqualifications.
Defending dangerous driving and other offences carrying mandatory disqualification, from police station to court.
Applying for early return of driving licences before ban periods expire where circumstances support an application.
If you get 12 or more penalty points within three years, you will usually lose your licence under the “totting up” rules. The court can also ban you outright for offences such as drink driving, dangerous driving, or refusing to give a breath, blood, or urine sample.
We can put forward strong arguments to show that a ban would cause real hardship to you and others who rely on you, not just normal inconvenience. If you are facing an immediate ban, we also help you decide how to plead, present your personal circumstances to the court, and advise on when and how you can ask to get your licence back early.
Defending drivers facing mandatory six-month disqualification for accumulating 12 or more penalty points, and presenting exceptional hardship arguments where disqualification would cause genuine hardship.
Presenting evidence of exceptional hardship to courts, showing that disqualification would affect employees, dependent family members, or others beyond ordinary inconvenience to drivers.
Advising on and applying for early return of driving licences for disqualified drivers where circumstances support a successful application to the court.
Disqualification proceedings often connect with other motoring and legal matters. Our specialist team provides comprehensive support at every stage.
Representation for operators and drivers facing DVSA investigations or prosecutions.
Advice for new drivers facing points, revocation, or motoring allegations.
Defence support for serious driving allegations, collisions, and licence threatening offences.
William, our virtual assistant, can answer your questions about disqualification from driving
Fosters Solicitors is ranked Top Tier for General Crime by Legal 500 UK. Our motoring team has specialist knowledge of disqualification provisions, presenting exceptional hardship arguments, defending totting up proceedings, and applying for early licence return to protect your driving entitlement.
Presenting compelling exceptional hardship arguments preventing totting up disqualifications where bans would cause genuine hardship beyond ordinary inconvenience.
Detailed knowledge of totting up provisions defending drivers approaching or reaching 12 penalty points.
Advising and applying for early return of driving licences where circumstances support successful applications.
Totting up is the process by which accumulating 12 or more penalty points within three years leads to mandatory disqualification. The minimum period is six months, rising to one year for a second totting up within three years and two years for a third within three years.
There’s no exceptional hardship procedure available once points are imposed following conviction. Prevention through defending prosecutions or arguing special reasons is the only way to avoid reaching 12 points. If already at or near 12 points, exceptional hardship arguments at the disqualification hearing can persuade courts to impose no disqualification or a shorter period.
Exceptional hardship allows courts to avoid disqualifying drivers who would face hardship beyond ordinary inconvenience. Hardship must affect others: employees losing jobs, dependent family members losing care, or vulnerable people relying on your driving. Personal inconvenience alone is not sufficient.
Courts scrutinise these arguments carefully. Compelling evidence including witness statements and financial documentation strengthens cases significantly. Exceptional hardship is not automatic and requires persuasive presentation. We’ve presented successful exceptional hardship arguments across a wide range of circumstances and advise honestly on prospects.
Several offences carry mandatory disqualification regardless of penalty points. Drink driving carries a mandatory 12-month minimum. Drug driving and failing to provide a specimen carry the same. Dangerous driving carries a mandatory 12-month minimum. Causing death by dangerous driving carries a mandatory two-year minimum.
Courts impose longer bans depending on seriousness and culpability. Repeat offences within specified periods attract longer mandatory minimums. We advise on likely disqualification periods at the outset and present mitigation seeking the shortest possible bans.
Disqualification follows conviction, so the most effective approach is defending the prosecution itself. Breath test procedures, equipment calibration, and blood sample handling can all be challenged. Special reasons, including spiked drinks or genuine emergencies, can avoid mandatory disqualification despite conviction.
Where conviction is inevitable, compelling mitigation addresses remorse, circumstances, and impact on your life. Drink drive rehabilitation courses can reduce the length of a disqualification where courts offer them. We advise on all options at every stage of proceedings.
Failing to provide a specimen of breath, blood, or urine when required by police is an offence carrying mandatory disqualification. Police must have reasonable grounds to require specimens, provide proper warnings about the offence of failure, and follow correct procedures throughout.
Defences include reasonable excuses such as medical conditions preventing provision. Procedural failures by police can also provide defences. We review all circumstances of failures to provide, advising whether defences exist and presenting the strongest case where they do.
Yes. Once a specified proportion of a disqualification has been served, you may apply to the court that disqualified you for early return of your licence. For disqualifications of under four years, applications can be made after two thirds of the ban has elapsed.
Courts consider whether it’s appropriate to restore the licence early, taking into account conduct since disqualification and any driving need. Applications are not automatic and require persuasive submissions. We advise on timing and prospects and represent drivers at early return hearings.
Yes. Exceptional hardship arguments are complex and courts scrutinise them carefully. Unrepresented drivers frequently present the wrong evidence or focus on the wrong factors, causing courts to dismiss arguments that could have succeeded with proper preparation and presentation.
For totting up, presenting compelling evidence persuasively is essential. For outright disqualification offences, early advice on plea, mitigation, and sentence planning significantly affects outcomes. Early licence return applications require persuasive submissions. We provide expert advice and representation at every stage.
Our team of motoring solicitors is comprised of compassionate and skilled legal professionals dedicated to supporting you through the most sensitive and personal legal matters.
Speak to our specialist motoring team for advice today.