Online free quote
enquiries@fosters-solicitors.co.uk
01603 620508
Inheritance dispute resolution has become increasingly common as more complexly composed families face conflict following the death of a loved one. Professional legal guidance is essential when challenging Wills, pursuing claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, or resolving disagreement between beneficiaries and executors, or when co-executors fall out. Our Dispute Resolution Solicitors provide expert inheritance dispute resolution services that help those involved, often families, to navigate such sensitive and complex legal matters.
Inheritance dispute resolution encompasses various types of estate conflict that can arise when family members disagree with the distribution of assets following someone’s death. These disputes often involve questions about the validity of Wills, inadequate provision for dependants, executor misconduct, or disagreements between beneficiaries. Understanding the legal grounds for challenging an estate and the available resolution tools is often crucial in achieving a fair outcome whilst preserving family relationships, where possible.
Commonly disputes focus on allegations that a testator (the person making a Will) lacked testamentary capacity when making their Will. Cases also involve the legal notion of undue influence, that is where someone has unlawfully pressured the deceased into making or changing their testamentary provisions. Contentious and forgery claims can arise when documents are suspected to have been falsified, or where someone has deceived the deceased person who made the Will about material facts in a way that has an adverse, unlawful effect.
Technical defects in Will execution can also form grounds for disputes. The Wills Act 1837 requires specific formalities including proper witnessing, and failure to comply with these requirements can render a Will invalid. Professional assistance when preparing a will avoids the occurrence of such issues and can remove the likelihood of a successful validity challenge.
Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 permit certain categories of people to seek reasonable financial provision from an estate. Eligible claimants include spouses, former spouses, cohabitees, children, and people who were financially dependent on the deceased. These cases focus on whether the Will or intestacy rules make reasonable financial provision for the claimant’s maintenance given all the circumstances of the case and the court will examine various factors including the size of the estate, the needs of the claimant(s), the potential for other claims and financial position of those beneficiaries that stand to lose out if a claim succeeds.
Effective inheritance dispute resolution typically begins with gathering evidence and assessing the strength of potential claims. Initial steps include obtaining copies of all relevant Wills, probate documents and estate accounts. Medical records are likely to be necessary where a case turns on testamentary capacity, whilst financial documentation supports dependency claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Pre-action guidance requires parties to attempt resolution before commencing court proceedings. This approach involves correspondence between solicitors, disclosure of key documents and participation in alternative dispute resolution (commonly abbreviated to ‘ADR’) where appropriate. Many disputes resolve during this phase, avoiding the cost and emotional stress of litigation.
When court proceedings become necessary, inheritance dispute resolution follows strict procedural requirements and time limits. For example, claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 must be commenced within six months of the date of a grant of probate, although extensions may be possible in limited circumstances, depending on the facts that we can analyse for you. The court process includes the preparation of pleadings, disclosure of relevant documents, the preparation of witness statements and ultimately a trial in which contested facts are ’tried’ and a judge decides the outcome by determining what is more or less likely to be the case.
Mediation plays a crucial role in modern dispute resolution, offering a confidential forum for exploring settlement options without the adversarial nature of court proceedings. A neutral mediator (who is not a judge and does not making a ruling) helps parties understand each other’s positions and work towards mutually acceptable solutions. This approach proves particularly valuable in family disputes where ongoing relationships might need to be preserved.
The benefits of mediation include cost effectiveness, speed, and flexibility in crafting solutions – parties in dispute can agree a solution that a judge in a court scenario cannot order. Unlike court judgments, mediated settlements can include non-financial terms such as apologies, explanations, or arrangements for ongoing family contact. Mediation also allows parties to maintain greater control over outcomes rather than leaving decisions to a judge. Mediated solutions can introduce compromise in a way that a court would never be able.
While less common than mediation, Early Neutral Evaluation provides another inheritance dispute resolution option where an independent expert assesses the merits of each party’s case. This process helps parties make informed decisions about settlement whilst understanding the likely outcomes if the matter proceeds to trial. Such evaluations prove particularly valuable in complex cases involving multiple legal issues, or particularly high value estates.
Strict time limits govern inheritance dispute resolution claims, making prompt legal advice essential. As mentioned above, claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 must generally be brought within six months of the grant of probate or letters of administration. This time limit is strict, though the court has discretion to permit late claims in limited circumstances, usually associated with there being some compelling reason for delay beyond the six-month statutory limitation.
Will validity challenges face different time limits depending on the specific grounds. Dispute involving fraud or forgery may be pursued later than other claims, whilst challenges based on a lack of capacity or undue influence should ideally be commenced soon after discovering grounds for dispute. The court’s approach to time limits varies based on the specific circumstances and the prejudice to other parties.
Inheritance disputes are subject to strict procedural requirements enshrined in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), that include the proper preparation of documents, service of proceedings and compliance with court rules through to trial. Failure to follow correct procedures can result in costs penalties or even the dismissal of claims. Professional legal representation can be key to navigating these complex procedural requirements so as to protect a client’s interests.
The cost of inheritance dispute resolution varies significantly from case to case, depending on complexity, the way the parties approach the dispute and when matters resolve, e.g. at the early negotiation stage, or later at mediation, or within court proceedings that lead ultimately to trial.
Initial legal costs typically include solicitor fees for case assessment, then further costs for evidence gathering and preliminary correspondence with the opponent. Careful case management and early settlement discussions can help reduce costs.
Conditional Fee Arrangements (CFAs) and After the Event (ATE) insurance can in some cases provide funding options for dispute resolution cases. These arrangements allow claimants to pursue claims without paying legal fees up front, although success fees and insurance premiums become payable if the case succeeds. Such arrangements make legal action accessible to parties who might otherwise be unable to afford litigation.
Estate funding represents another option and involves the estate paying the parties’ reasonable dispute resolution costs.
Consider Sarah, whose father left his entire estate worth £800,000 to his second wife, making no provision for Sarah despite her financial dependency following a recent divorce. Sarah’s inheritance dispute resolution case involves a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, in which she will claim that her father’s will fails to make reasonable financial provision for her maintenance as an adult child who was financially dependent on her father.
The process begins by gathering evidence about Sarah’s financial dependency on her late father, including correspondence with him about the support he gave her when alive, bank records showing regular payments and generally setting out Sarah’s financial position in life.
Mediation provides an opportunity for Sarah and her stepmother to explore solutions that meet Sarah’s financial needs whilst preserving the stepmother’s own financial security. The resolution might include a lump sum payment from estate assets or arrangements for ongoing financial support, avoiding the costs and uncertainty of contested court proceedings.
At Fosters Solicitors, we routinely help family members and other dependents to seek reasonable financial provision in circumstances in which they have been overlooked. Whether you are a claimant, or a beneficiary that would be affected by a variation to the provisions in a will, or indeed a personal representative with responsibility for administering an estate, we can offer you expert advice and assistance.
Contact us for more information.
Inheritance dispute resolution is a legal process for resolving conflicts over estate disputes, typically the distribution of estate wealth following someone’s death. Disputes can include challenging Wills, pursuing claims for inadequate provision and resolving disputes pertaining to beneficiaries and executors through negotiation, mediation, or court proceedings.
Claims can be brought by spouses, former spouses, cohabitees, children, stepchildren, and people who were financially dependent on the deceased.
Claims under the Inheritance Act 1975 must usually be brought within 6 months of the grant of probate, so acting promptly can be crucial. In some cases the court will allow a claim to be brought out of time, so after the 6 month period has expired.
Yes, many cases settle through negotiation, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution methods. Mediation is particularly effective in family disputes, allowing parties to reach mutually acceptable solutions whilst preserving relationships and reducing costs.
Costs vary depending on case complexity and the type of resolution employed. Early resolution through mediation typically means that costs are significantly less than if a claim proceeds to a trial. Mediation can cost a fraction of the legal costs to trial and like a court judgment, mediation agreements can be legally binding.
This article was produced on the 27th October 2025 for information purposes only and should not be construed or relied upon as specific legal advice.
